Saturday, December 28, 2019

You Have a Right to be Wrong: That Doesn't Make Wrong Right.

You Have a Right to be Wrong: That Doesn't Make Wrong Right.

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

right or wrongTruth and error, right and wrong, exist. Yes, there can be differences of opinion on some issues, but on other issues it's either right or wrong: "For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you" (1 Corinthians 11:19, KJV). The Greek word is "haeresis" in this verse, correctly translated as "heresies," even though some modern translations render it as "factions" (NKJV) or "differences" (NIV): the latter makes it seem like St. Paul may merely be writing about minor, insignificant differences of opinion.

But look closely at the context: in verse 17 he writes - "Now in giving these instructions, I do not praise you, since you come together not for the better but for the worse." The phrase "for the better but for the worse" indicates clearly a matter of good or bad, right or wrong, not just a matter of opinion. And what is the result? In verse 20, St. Paul writes - "Therefore when you come together in one place, it is not to eat the Lord's Supper." In other words, they had turned the Holy Communion of the Lord's real Body and Blood (ch. 10:15-16) into a farce. And the consequence was: "For he who eats and drinks unworthily eats and drinks damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body" (v. 29).

The root meaning of the Greek word "haeresis" is choice, that is, (specifically) a party or (abstractly) disunion, a sect (Strong's Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries). So the idea that the freedom of choice ought to be absolute and that there's no right or wrong is a logical absurdity that leads to a party spirit, division, and disunity. To say that "Everything is relative and that's the absolute truth!" is a logical contradiction. Why? Because it requires an absolute standard to state that there are no absolute standards, that everything is relative. Certainly, some things are relative and variable, but in order to assign a value to those variables, it requires a fixed, absolute value. We should have learned in basic algebra that to solve a problem with multiple variables, you need a known value. Finding that fixed value isn't easy but it is possible ~~ and necessary!

This underscores the need for an authoritative, correct interpretation and application of the "measuring rod" (canon) of Holy Scripture. What or who would that be? To believe that any cowherd or any milkmaid can rightly interpret Scripture is just plain nonsense: that's why today we have over 20,000 mutually contradictory denominations, factions, and sects that all claim to be true Christianity. St. Peter wrote - "knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation, for prophecy never came by the will [choice] of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit" (2 Peter 1:20-21). There cannot be private interpretations: the word "for" introduces the answer to the question of interpretation: just as it took holy men of God to record God's Word as they were moved by the Holy Spirit, it also takes holy men of God - those recognized as holy or "saints" in Christian tradition - to rightly interpret Scripture. The consensus of these holy Church Fathers is called Holy Tradition. Otherwise, we end up with heresies and sects multiplying like rabbits.

"God does not destroy the human freedom to plunge into error," - wrote St. John Chrysostom. And St. Vincent of Lerins wrote - "The overruling justice of God permits schism temporarily in order to strengthen and vindicate faith." But some will say - "We have liberty in Christ! That means we're free to choose whatever we want to do, to live however we want to live." St. Paul deals with this in chapters 4 and 5 of his letter to the Galatians: "But now after you have known God, or rather are known by God, how is it that you turn again to the weak and beggarly elements, to which you desire again to be in bondage?" (ch. 4:9). This refers to an excessive emphasis on legalism, on bondage to the Law of Moses.

At the other extreme, we shouldn't use "liberty" as a rationalization for immorality, but rather as the reason to serve one another: "For you, brothers, have been called to liberty; only do not use liberty as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another" (ch. 5:13). And St. Paul writes in Romans 6:16 - "Do you not know that to whom you present yourselves slaves to obey, you are that one's slave whom you obey, whether of sin leading to death, or of obedience leading to righteousness?" Giving yourself over to "whatever feels good, do it!" isn't liberty, it's slavery to sin: true freedom is being free from the bondage to sin, it's the ability to freely choose what is right and good.


Click on SUBSCRIBE! to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!


There will always be people who insist on doing their own thing: "I'll do it my way!" has become America's theme song, almost its national anthem. They will persist in activities that they know are harmful to themselves or to society - smoking, drinking, overeating, sexual immorality, abortion - because they have "the right to choose." For them, the saying applies - "There's no cure for stupid!" You can't correct a person who refuses correction and instruction, who insists on remaining ignorant. God is right and true when He judges, even when people insist on their right to be wrong. St. John wrote in Revelation 16:5-11 -

"I heard the angel of the waters saying, 'You are righteous, Who are and Who were, You Holy One, because You have judged these things. For they poured out the blood of the saints and the prophets, and You have given them blood to drink. They deserve this.' I heard the altar saying, 'Yes, Lord God, the Almighty, true and righteous are Your judgments.' The fourth angel poured out his bowl on the sun, and it was given to him to scorch men with fire. People were scorched with great heat, and people blasphemed the name of God who has the power over these plagues. They didn't repent and give Him glory. The fifth poured out his bowl on the throne of the beast, and his kingdom was darkened. They gnawed their tongues because of the pain, and they blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores. They didn't repent of their works."

Many people today believe that Christianity is just a myth, so they can continue doing their own thing and there will never be any consequences, any judgment. St. Peter wrote that - "in the last days mockers will come, walking after their own lusts, and saying, 'Where is the promise of His coming? For, from the day that the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.' For this they willfully forget, that there were heavens from of old, and an earth formed out of water and amid water, by the Word of God; by which means the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished. But the heavens that now are, and the earth, by the same Word have been stored up for fire, being reserved against the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men" (2 Peter 3:3-7). As God once judged the world by sending a flood, so will He judge the world by fire the next time:

"The Lord is not slow concerning His promise, as some count slowness; but is patient with us, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will be dissolved with fervent heat, and the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up. Therefore since all these things are thus to be destroyed, what manner of persons ought you to be in holy living and godliness, looking for and earnestly desiring the coming of the day of God, by reason of which the heavens being on fire will be dissolved, and the elements will melt with fervent heat?" (2 Peter 3:9-12).

This may sound rather grim, but climate scientists have now come to the same conclusion: the world is heating up and we're having more and more wildfires all over the world. And what are people doing about it? Are they willing to change their lifestyle? Or are they saying - "We can keep on doing what we've been doing and life will keep on going on like it always has, nothing to worry about!" No! God is very patient with us humans, He doesn't wish for anyone to perish, but His patience is eventually and finally coming to an end. Then St. Peter warns his readers to be careful in trying to interpret St. Paul's writings "in which are some things hard to understand, which the ignorant and unsettled twist, as they also do to the other Scriptures, to their own destruction" (v. 16).

"But, according to His promise, we look for new heavens and a new earth, in which dwells righteousness. Therefore, beloved, seeing that you look for these things, be diligent to be found in peace, without blemish and blameless in His sight" (2 Peter 3:13-14). There's your happy ending!

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please Support Agape Restoration Society: click on the "DONATE" button there.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


Saturday, December 14, 2019

All Things Are Lawful For Me

"All Things Are Lawful For Me"

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

The ProposalThis painting by Sir Alma Tadema in 1892, in the blog article "Why Sexual Morality May be Far More Important than You Ever Thought" by Kirk Durston, illustrates the culture of courtship just over a century ago. Today, courtship has degenerated into having sex on the first or second date. I strongly encourage you -- no, I urge you -- to read Durston's article! He quotes from research done on 80 cultures over many centuries.

The article describes how the "sexual revolution" of the 1960s, about 60 years ago, began the process of displacing traditional Judeo-Christian morality with the "New Morality" that's nothing other than the old immorality. It explains that historically, cultures which change from strict chastity to complete sexual looseness also abandon belief in God and rational thinking within three generations, which in turn leads to the collapse of that culture. But the process in the USA actually began quite a bit earlier, in the 1930s, when certain aspects of Freudian psychology were mainstreamed into American society and culture by psychologist Wilhelm Reich: see the news headline "WE ARE BRINGING THEM THE PLAGUE" - THE ROLE OF FREUDISM IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF TRADITIONAL VALUES in today's Hosken-News.

Because this process actually began 90 years ago in the 1930s with the intellectuals and was popularized into "pop culture" with the Woodstock Festival, considering that one human generation is about 30 years, we are actually now already in the third generation. This would mean that we are presently on the cusp of the collapse of our culture: there's even talk of a coming "Second Civil War." One only needs to look at the political situation in which prostitution, adultery, and bribery are all being bandied about as if they were perfectly normal and acceptable. Various politicians and their families are [in]famous for saying or implying - "There's nothing wrong with it!" and "I did nothing wrong!" - showing that they don't understand the difference between morality and legality.

This is what the Apostle Paul meant when he wrote - "'All things are lawful for me,' but not all things are helpful. 'All things are lawful for me,' but I will not be dominated by anything. 'Foods for the belly, and the belly for foods,' but God will destroy both it and them. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body" (1 Corinthians 6:12-13). What is legal or lawful is not necessarily moral: laws against adultery and fornication were canceled because, as they said, "You can't put a policeman in every bedroom" (to enforce such laws). But such anti-social and instant-gratification behaviors are what parents should have been teaching their children to avoid. It's clear from this Bible text that St. Paul is not writing merely about food for the belly, but also about sexual morality and the lack thereof. It may be legal nowadays, but it's still wrong and immoral!

So we have one political clan being punished for bribery, because they tried to have another political clan's bribery investigated, while both sides openly commit adultery and fornication, saying - "There's nothing wrong with it!" We have some investigators into the crime of Planned Parenthood selling human baby organs for profit being sued by Planned Parenthood for millions of dollars because they exposed this heinous crime: see Jury finds Center for Medical Progress liable to Planned Parenthood for exposing baby body part trafficking. We have pro-abortion folks insisting on the "human right" to kill their unborn babies, depriving those babies of the most basic human right, the right to life: see Saving Human Rights from the Human Rights Movement.

We have become so morally confused that politicians and ordinary people like you and me have to debate whether a baby who is born alive during a botched abortion should be kept alive, or whether it's OK to put the newborn baby in a closet and simply let it die: see March for Life to Highlight Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. How can anyone even think that killing our children is just fine if we simply don't want them anymore? The next on the chopping block will be the elderly and the disabled: it's not convenient to pay so much to keep them alive, so ~~~ Wait! No, that's not the next thing! It's already been happening for twenty years now! See: 'Passive Euthanasia' in Hospitals Is the Norm, Doctors Say.


Click on SUBSCRIBE to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!


Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice on the United States Supreme Court, gave the speech "Faith and reason are mutually reinforcing" on October 3, 2019 for the dedication of a new chapel at Hillsdale College. In his speech he said:

"By constructing this Chapel, the College upholds the continued importance of its Christian roots, even as it respects the rights of each person to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience. Our country was founded on the view that a correct understanding of the nature of God and the human person is critical to preserving the liberty that we so enjoy. John Adams wrote, 'Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.' He recognized that the preservation of liberty is not guaranteed. Without the guardrails supplied by religious conviction, popular sovereignty can devolve into mob rule, unmoored from any conception of objective truth."

These are good and true words. Faith and reason are indeed mutually supporting. It is unreasonable and illogical to say - "There is no God" because it's an absolute statement to say there are no absolutes: thus it's a logical contradiction: there must be a God, however difficult it is for us finite beings to describe Him. But "to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience" requires a conscience that is properly formed and developed by one's parents and church. Parents cannot and must not leave their children's moral formation up to the schools or even up to the church, driving them to church, dropping them off, then driving back home to catch another hour of sleep or watch TV! Children learn by parents' example, not only by their words.

These days many people say - "That religion stuff is just a myth!" But St. Peter wrote - "For we did not follow cleverly devised fables, when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of His [Christ's] majesty. For He received from God the Father honor and glory, when the voice came to Him from the Majestic Glory, 'This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.' This voice we heard come out of heaven when we were with Him in the holy mountain" (2 Peter 1:16-18).

Peter was referring to the Transfiguration, described in Luke 9:18-36. In the first part of this passage, Jesus told His disciples they must take up their cross and follow Him, then asked them who people say that He is, and "Who do YOU say that I am?" Peter made his famous confession: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God!" But right after that, when Jesus said He must go up to Jerusalem, be arrested and crucified, Peter tried to stop Him from going there: "Not so, Lord!" Christ's reply was - "Get behind Me, Satan!" The mystery of the Incarnation is wrapped up in self-denial, and Jesus is the personification of self-control, not seeking instant gratification. Only this can lead to transfiguration, being transformed into His image and likeness:

"Now the Lord is the Spirit and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. But we all, with unveiled face beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are transformed into the same image from glory to glory, even as from the Lord, the Spirit" (2 Corinthians 3:17-18). This is true liberation!

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please Support Agape Restoration Society: click on the "DONATE" button there.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!