Saturday, December 28, 2019

You Have a Right to be Wrong: That Doesn't Make Wrong Right.

You Have a Right to be Wrong: That Doesn't Make Wrong Right.

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

right or wrongTruth and error, right and wrong, exist. Yes, there can be differences of opinion on some issues, but on other issues it's either right or wrong: "For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you" (1 Corinthians 11:19, KJV). The Greek word is "haeresis" in this verse, correctly translated as "heresies," even though some modern translations render it as "factions" (NKJV) or "differences" (NIV): the latter makes it seem like St. Paul may merely be writing about minor, insignificant differences of opinion.

But look closely at the context: in verse 17 he writes - "Now in giving these instructions, I do not praise you, since you come together not for the better but for the worse." The phrase "for the better but for the worse" indicates clearly a matter of good or bad, right or wrong, not just a matter of opinion. And what is the result? In verse 20, St. Paul writes - "Therefore when you come together in one place, it is not to eat the Lord's Supper." In other words, they had turned the Holy Communion of the Lord's real Body and Blood (ch. 10:15-16) into a farce. And the consequence was: "For he who eats and drinks unworthily eats and drinks damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body" (v. 29).

The root meaning of the Greek word "haeresis" is choice, that is, (specifically) a party or (abstractly) disunion, a sect (Strong's Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries). So the idea that the freedom of choice ought to be absolute and that there's no right or wrong is a logical absurdity that leads to a party spirit, division, and disunity. To say that "Everything is relative and that's the absolute truth!" is a logical contradiction. Why? Because it requires an absolute standard to state that there are no absolute standards, that everything is relative. Certainly, some things are relative and variable, but in order to assign a value to those variables, it requires a fixed, absolute value. We should have learned in basic algebra that to solve a problem with multiple variables, you need a known value. Finding that fixed value isn't easy but it is possible ~~ and necessary!

This underscores the need for an authoritative, correct interpretation and application of the "measuring rod" (canon) of Holy Scripture. What or who would that be? To believe that any cowherd or any milkmaid can rightly interpret Scripture is just plain nonsense: that's why today we have over 20,000 mutually contradictory denominations, factions, and sects that all claim to be true Christianity. St. Peter wrote - "knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation, for prophecy never came by the will [choice] of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit" (2 Peter 1:20-21). There cannot be private interpretations: the word "for" introduces the answer to the question of interpretation: just as it took holy men of God to record God's Word as they were moved by the Holy Spirit, it also takes holy men of God - those recognized as holy or "saints" in Christian tradition - to rightly interpret Scripture. The consensus of these holy Church Fathers is called Holy Tradition. Otherwise, we end up with heresies and sects multiplying like rabbits.

"God does not destroy the human freedom to plunge into error," - wrote St. John Chrysostom. And St. Vincent of Lerins wrote - "The overruling justice of God permits schism temporarily in order to strengthen and vindicate faith." But some will say - "We have liberty in Christ! That means we're free to choose whatever we want to do, to live however we want to live." St. Paul deals with this in chapters 4 and 5 of his letter to the Galatians: "But now after you have known God, or rather are known by God, how is it that you turn again to the weak and beggarly elements, to which you desire again to be in bondage?" (ch. 4:9). This refers to an excessive emphasis on legalism, on bondage to the Law of Moses.

At the other extreme, we shouldn't use "liberty" as a rationalization for immorality, but rather as the reason to serve one another: "For you, brothers, have been called to liberty; only do not use liberty as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another" (ch. 5:13). And St. Paul writes in Romans 6:16 - "Do you not know that to whom you present yourselves slaves to obey, you are that one's slave whom you obey, whether of sin leading to death, or of obedience leading to righteousness?" Giving yourself over to "whatever feels good, do it!" isn't liberty, it's slavery to sin: true freedom is being free from the bondage to sin, it's the ability to freely choose what is right and good.


Click on SUBSCRIBE! to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!


There will always be people who insist on doing their own thing: "I'll do it my way!" has become America's theme song, almost its national anthem. They will persist in activities that they know are harmful to themselves or to society - smoking, drinking, overeating, sexual immorality, abortion - because they have "the right to choose." For them, the saying applies - "There's no cure for stupid!" You can't correct a person who refuses correction and instruction, who insists on remaining ignorant. God is right and true when He judges, even when people insist on their right to be wrong. St. John wrote in Revelation 16:5-11 -

"I heard the angel of the waters saying, 'You are righteous, Who are and Who were, You Holy One, because You have judged these things. For they poured out the blood of the saints and the prophets, and You have given them blood to drink. They deserve this.' I heard the altar saying, 'Yes, Lord God, the Almighty, true and righteous are Your judgments.' The fourth angel poured out his bowl on the sun, and it was given to him to scorch men with fire. People were scorched with great heat, and people blasphemed the name of God who has the power over these plagues. They didn't repent and give Him glory. The fifth poured out his bowl on the throne of the beast, and his kingdom was darkened. They gnawed their tongues because of the pain, and they blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores. They didn't repent of their works."

Many people today believe that Christianity is just a myth, so they can continue doing their own thing and there will never be any consequences, any judgment. St. Peter wrote that - "in the last days mockers will come, walking after their own lusts, and saying, 'Where is the promise of His coming? For, from the day that the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.' For this they willfully forget, that there were heavens from of old, and an earth formed out of water and amid water, by the Word of God; by which means the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished. But the heavens that now are, and the earth, by the same Word have been stored up for fire, being reserved against the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men" (2 Peter 3:3-7). As God once judged the world by sending a flood, so will He judge the world by fire the next time:

"The Lord is not slow concerning His promise, as some count slowness; but is patient with us, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will be dissolved with fervent heat, and the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up. Therefore since all these things are thus to be destroyed, what manner of persons ought you to be in holy living and godliness, looking for and earnestly desiring the coming of the day of God, by reason of which the heavens being on fire will be dissolved, and the elements will melt with fervent heat?" (2 Peter 3:9-12).

This may sound rather grim, but climate scientists have now come to the same conclusion: the world is heating up and we're having more and more wildfires all over the world. And what are people doing about it? Are they willing to change their lifestyle? Or are they saying - "We can keep on doing what we've been doing and life will keep on going on like it always has, nothing to worry about!" No! God is very patient with us humans, He doesn't wish for anyone to perish, but His patience is eventually and finally coming to an end. Then St. Peter warns his readers to be careful in trying to interpret St. Paul's writings "in which are some things hard to understand, which the ignorant and unsettled twist, as they also do to the other Scriptures, to their own destruction" (v. 16).

"But, according to His promise, we look for new heavens and a new earth, in which dwells righteousness. Therefore, beloved, seeing that you look for these things, be diligent to be found in peace, without blemish and blameless in His sight" (2 Peter 3:13-14). There's your happy ending!

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please Support Agape Restoration Society: click on the "DONATE" button there.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


Saturday, December 14, 2019

All Things Are Lawful For Me

"All Things Are Lawful For Me"

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

The ProposalThis painting by Sir Alma Tadema in 1892, in the blog article "Why Sexual Morality May be Far More Important than You Ever Thought" by Kirk Durston, illustrates the culture of courtship just over a century ago. Today, courtship has degenerated into having sex on the first or second date. I strongly encourage you -- no, I urge you -- to read Durston's article! He quotes from research done on 80 cultures over many centuries.

The article describes how the "sexual revolution" of the 1960s, about 60 years ago, began the process of displacing traditional Judeo-Christian morality with the "New Morality" that's nothing other than the old immorality. It explains that historically, cultures which change from strict chastity to complete sexual looseness also abandon belief in God and rational thinking within three generations, which in turn leads to the collapse of that culture. But the process in the USA actually began quite a bit earlier, in the 1930s, when certain aspects of Freudian psychology were mainstreamed into American society and culture by psychologist Wilhelm Reich: see the news headline "WE ARE BRINGING THEM THE PLAGUE" - THE ROLE OF FREUDISM IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF TRADITIONAL VALUES in today's Hosken-News.

Because this process actually began 90 years ago in the 1930s with the intellectuals and was popularized into "pop culture" with the Woodstock Festival, considering that one human generation is about 30 years, we are actually now already in the third generation. This would mean that we are presently on the cusp of the collapse of our culture: there's even talk of a coming "Second Civil War." One only needs to look at the political situation in which prostitution, adultery, and bribery are all being bandied about as if they were perfectly normal and acceptable. Various politicians and their families are [in]famous for saying or implying - "There's nothing wrong with it!" and "I did nothing wrong!" - showing that they don't understand the difference between morality and legality.

This is what the Apostle Paul meant when he wrote - "'All things are lawful for me,' but not all things are helpful. 'All things are lawful for me,' but I will not be dominated by anything. 'Foods for the belly, and the belly for foods,' but God will destroy both it and them. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body" (1 Corinthians 6:12-13). What is legal or lawful is not necessarily moral: laws against adultery and fornication were canceled because, as they said, "You can't put a policeman in every bedroom" (to enforce such laws). But such anti-social and instant-gratification behaviors are what parents should have been teaching their children to avoid. It's clear from this Bible text that St. Paul is not writing merely about food for the belly, but also about sexual morality and the lack thereof. It may be legal nowadays, but it's still wrong and immoral!

So we have one political clan being punished for bribery, because they tried to have another political clan's bribery investigated, while both sides openly commit adultery and fornication, saying - "There's nothing wrong with it!" We have some investigators into the crime of Planned Parenthood selling human baby organs for profit being sued by Planned Parenthood for millions of dollars because they exposed this heinous crime: see Jury finds Center for Medical Progress liable to Planned Parenthood for exposing baby body part trafficking. We have pro-abortion folks insisting on the "human right" to kill their unborn babies, depriving those babies of the most basic human right, the right to life: see Saving Human Rights from the Human Rights Movement.

We have become so morally confused that politicians and ordinary people like you and me have to debate whether a baby who is born alive during a botched abortion should be kept alive, or whether it's OK to put the newborn baby in a closet and simply let it die: see March for Life to Highlight Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. How can anyone even think that killing our children is just fine if we simply don't want them anymore? The next on the chopping block will be the elderly and the disabled: it's not convenient to pay so much to keep them alive, so ~~~ Wait! No, that's not the next thing! It's already been happening for twenty years now! See: 'Passive Euthanasia' in Hospitals Is the Norm, Doctors Say.


Click on SUBSCRIBE to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!


Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice on the United States Supreme Court, gave the speech "Faith and reason are mutually reinforcing" on October 3, 2019 for the dedication of a new chapel at Hillsdale College. In his speech he said:

"By constructing this Chapel, the College upholds the continued importance of its Christian roots, even as it respects the rights of each person to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience. Our country was founded on the view that a correct understanding of the nature of God and the human person is critical to preserving the liberty that we so enjoy. John Adams wrote, 'Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.' He recognized that the preservation of liberty is not guaranteed. Without the guardrails supplied by religious conviction, popular sovereignty can devolve into mob rule, unmoored from any conception of objective truth."

These are good and true words. Faith and reason are indeed mutually supporting. It is unreasonable and illogical to say - "There is no God" because it's an absolute statement to say there are no absolutes: thus it's a logical contradiction: there must be a God, however difficult it is for us finite beings to describe Him. But "to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience" requires a conscience that is properly formed and developed by one's parents and church. Parents cannot and must not leave their children's moral formation up to the schools or even up to the church, driving them to church, dropping them off, then driving back home to catch another hour of sleep or watch TV! Children learn by parents' example, not only by their words.

These days many people say - "That religion stuff is just a myth!" But St. Peter wrote - "For we did not follow cleverly devised fables, when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of His [Christ's] majesty. For He received from God the Father honor and glory, when the voice came to Him from the Majestic Glory, 'This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.' This voice we heard come out of heaven when we were with Him in the holy mountain" (2 Peter 1:16-18).

Peter was referring to the Transfiguration, described in Luke 9:18-36. In the first part of this passage, Jesus told His disciples they must take up their cross and follow Him, then asked them who people say that He is, and "Who do YOU say that I am?" Peter made his famous confession: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God!" But right after that, when Jesus said He must go up to Jerusalem, be arrested and crucified, Peter tried to stop Him from going there: "Not so, Lord!" Christ's reply was - "Get behind Me, Satan!" The mystery of the Incarnation is wrapped up in self-denial, and Jesus is the personification of self-control, not seeking instant gratification. Only this can lead to transfiguration, being transformed into His image and likeness:

"Now the Lord is the Spirit and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. But we all, with unveiled face beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are transformed into the same image from glory to glory, even as from the Lord, the Spirit" (2 Corinthians 3:17-18). This is true liberation!

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please Support Agape Restoration Society: click on the "DONATE" button there.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


Saturday, November 16, 2019

Saving Abandoned Children

Saving Abandoned Children

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

Freddie FiggersIn the article Baby Abandoned at Dumpster After Birth Is Now CEO of Company Valued Over $62 Million, you'll find out about Freddie Figgers, a successful young Afro-American businessman whose birth mother abandoned him by a dumpster.

After he was rescued, Nathan and Betty Figgers adopted him, raised him well, and he developed amazing talents in computer and software skills: by age 15 he had his own business, and "before the age of 30 he had his own telecommunications company, Figgers Communications." You never know how someone who others think of as a piece of trash will turn out!

Several similar stories can be told about abandoned little boys in Kenya, Africa: the Ahadi Family Trust has rescued dozens and dozens of orphaned and abandoned boys, raising them in a loving family atmosphere - not in barrack-like dormitories, but four boys to a bedroom. They have personal sponsors in the U.S., get home-cooked meals, are enrolled in schools, and many have gone on to finish their university educations, find good jobs, get married and raise families. My sister Phyllis Masso and her Physics-PhD husband Jon founded Ahadi several years ago after Jon retired from American Optical as V.P. of Research. Jon passed away of heart failure in Kenya a few years ago, but Phyllis, now in her 70s, is still co-managing Ahadi.

In Ezekiel 16:2-6, we read a prophetic parable of how the Lord rescued Israel who had been abandoned at birth, not even the birthing-blood being washed away:

"Thus says the Lord God to Jerusalem: Your origin and your birth is of the land of the Canaanite; the Amorite was your father, and your mother was a Hittite. As for your birth, in the day you were born your navel was not cut, neither were you washed in water to cleanse you; you weren't salted at all, nor swaddled at all. No eye pitied you, to do any of these things to you, to have compassion on you; but you were cast out in the open field, for that your person was abhorred, in the day that you were born. When I passed by you, and saw you wallowing in your blood, I said to you, Though you are in your blood, live; yes, I said to you, Though you are in your blood, live."

Even though the Lord rescued Israel and made her His own bride, she became unfaithful to Him. Chapter 23 continues this parable of how Jerusalem and Samaria, capitals of Judah and Israel after the split into the southern and northern kingdoms, fell into spiritual prostitution by worshiping the idols of surrounding nations, being drawn in by their military prowess and their economic attractions. As I wrote above, you never know how someone who others think of as a piece of trash will turn out ~~ some turn out amazingly well, others, well, are a disappointment, to put it mildly!

But the story doesn't end there: the prophets of Israel foretold that a Messiah would come. He would set things straight and deliver Israel from her oppressions ~~ which were not, as it turned out, merely external, foreign military oppressors, but rather Israel's own inner transgressions that brought on those oppressions.

The Apostle John wrote in ch. 1:10-11 of his Gospel - "He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world didn't recognize Him. He came to His own, and those who were His own didn't receive Him." Jesus the Messiah first sent His disciples to proclaim the Kingdom to the Jews ~~ but the reception was often lukewarm. Then, in ch. 4, we read how He took His disciples through Samaria, which by that time had become half-pagan/half-Jewish, so the "true Jews" rejected them as worse that ordinary Gentiles. Being tired from the journey, Jesus sat down by the well, then a woman came with a big clay jug to draw some water. Jesus asked her for a drink -


Click on SUBSCRIBE to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!

"The Samaritan woman therefore said to him, 'How is it that you, being a Jew, ask for a drink from me, a Samaritan woman?' (For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans.) Jesus answered her, 'If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, "Give me a drink," you would have asked him, and He would have given you living water.' The woman said to Him, 'Sir, you have nothing to draw with, and the well is deep. From where then do You have that living water? Are You greater than our father, Jacob, who gave us the well, and drank of it himself, as did his sons, and his cattle?'

Jesus answered her, 'Everyone who drinks of this water will thirst again, but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him will never thirst again; but the water that I will give him will become in him a well of water springing up to eternal life.' The woman said to Him, 'Sir, give me this water, so that I don't get thirsty, neither come all the way here to draw.' Jesus said to her, 'Go, call your husband, and come here.' The woman answered, 'I have no husband.' Jesus said to her, 'You said well, "I have no husband," for you have had five husbands; and he whom you now have is not your husband. This you have said truly.' The woman said to Him, 'Sir, I perceive that you are a prophet. Our fathers worshiped in this mountain, and you Jews say that in Jerusalem is the place where people ought to worship.'" (John 4:9-20)

Do you see what's going on here? Jesus, the Messiah, the Deliverer, isn't merely delivering Israel from her Roman oppressors: He is delivering Israel and Samaria from their internal oppressions of sin! Not like Ezekiel who condemned Israel and Samaria for their spiritual prostitutions, selling themselves too cheap to the surrounding idolatrous nations; Jesus gently drew this loose woman into dialog with Himself to the point where she said -

"'I know that Messiah is coming,' (He who is called Christ). 'When he has come, he will declare to us all things.' Jesus said to her, 'I am He, the One who is speaking to you.' At this, His disciples came. They marveled that He was speaking with a woman; yet no one said, 'What are You looking for?' or, 'Why are You speaking with her?' So the woman left her water pot, and went away into the city, and said to the people, 'Come, see a Man who told me everything that I did. Can this be the Messiah?'" (verses 25-29).

The lights went on! She recognized Jesus as the Messiah! This passage, BTW (by the way), is the longest dialog of Jesus in the New Testament ~~ and with a prostitute, at that! The Ancient Church tells us that this woman, a former prostitute, became a disciple of Jesus and is known as St. Photini (Light).

In another passage of John's Gospel, when Jesus was teaching in the Temple, the Pharisees brought to Him a woman caught in the very act of adultery. They reminded Him that the Law of Moses required that an adultress should be stoned to death, and asked Him what He would do. He replied -

"'He who is without sin among you, let him throw the first stone at her.' Again He stooped down, and with His finger wrote on the ground. They, when they heard it, being convicted by their conscience, went out one by one, beginning from the oldest, even to the last. Jesus was left alone with the woman where she was, in the middle. Jesus, standing up, saw her and said, 'Woman, where are your accusers? Did no one condemn you?' She said, 'No one, Lord.' Jesus said, 'Neither do I condemn you. Go your way. From now on, sin no more'" (John 8:7b-11).

Note carefully that Jesus doesn't condemn, nor does He ignore or excuse sin; rather, He forgives sin. He doesn't say, "Go and sin some more"; rather, He says, "Go and sin no more."

Finally, when the Apostle John tells us about Jesus' triumphal entry into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday (John 12:12-15), he relates how the day before, six days before the Passover, Mary, the sister of Lazarus whom Jesus had raised from the dead, anointing Him with "ointment of pure nard, very precious" (verse 3). Mary and Martha were beloved disciples of Jesus. Matthew 26:6-7 and Mark 14:3 tell us the same story, saying it was in the house of Simon the Pharisee. But in Luke 7:36-50, the woman who anointed Jesus' feet with ointment in the house of Simon the Pharisee is called "a sinner" - most likely a prostitute. TBH (to be honest), although some Bible scholars deny that a prostitute could be the same woman as Mary the sister of Martha, the disciples of Jesus, IMHO (in my humble opinion) most of the details line up. So here's the third prostitute whom Jesus forgave and who became a disciple of Jesus!

What we have here, then, is the Lord God of heaven and earth Who came down to our level, not to judge us, but to take on human flesh and be tempted in every way as we are, yet without sin. Still, He sympathizes with our weaknesses to such a great extent that He laid down His life to wash away our sins by taking them on Himself, dying for us on the Cross, rising again for our salvation, and sending the Holy Spirit for our sanctification and deification: "~~ by which He has granted to us His exceedingly great and precious promises; that through these you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped from the corruption that is in the world by lust" (2 Peter 1:4).

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please Support Agape Restoration Society.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


Saturday, November 2, 2019

God Works and We Must Also Work

God Works and We Must Also Work

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

work out your salvationIn my essay last December Works of the Law vs. Good Works, I wrote about our need to differentiate between "good works" and "works of the Law" - trying to fulfill all of the hundreds of miniscule details of the Pharisees' interpretations of the Law of Moses. Of course, we ought to do good works to all people! And in my earlier essay We Are Coworkers Together With God, I explained the idea of "synergy" or "working together with God." It lists several scripture texts that illustrate this principle.

So in this essay today, I'd like to delve into another aspect of works: how faith in Jesus Christ requires that we work, that we DO something, not simply sit back and wait on God for a miracle. Sometimes all we can DO is cry out to God: "Help! Have mercy on me!" Remember the two blind men who followed Jesus, "calling out and saying, 'Have mercy on us, son of David!' When He had come into the house, the blind men came to him. Jesus said to them, 'Do you believe that I am able to do this?' They told him, 'Yes, Lord.' Then He touched their eyes, saying, "According to your faith be it done to you" (Matthew 9:27-29). They could have sat there on the side of the road, saying nothing and just hoping Jesus would see them. But they didn't just sit there, they cried out for help.

And when Jesus was out in the countryside with His disciples, all sorts of people heard where He was and came running. Afterwards, the disciples said to Him - "This place is deserted, and it is late in the day. Send them away, so they may go into the surrounding country and villages and buy themselves bread, for they have nothing to eat." There were no grocery stores nearby, not even a Seven-Eleven. But instead, Jesus told His disciples - "You give them something to eat." But they could barely scrape up $200 between themselves, and that wouldn't be enough to feed this crowd of thousands. So Jesus asked them - "How many loaves do you have? Go see." They checked their backpacks and said - "Five loaves, and two fish." Jesus took up what they had, offered it to the Father in Heaven, they handed it out, and Wow! There was enough for 5,000 men! (Mark 6:35-44). Jesus asks us to use what we have, do what we can do, and He does the rest.

Soon after that, a similar thing happened: a huge crowd gathered to hear Jesus teach but they got hungry. Again, He asked His disciples - "How many loaves do you have?" They said, "Seven." He had the crowd sit down. Then - "He took the seven loaves. Having given thanks, He broke them, and gave them to His disciples to serve, and they served the multitude. They had a few small fish. Having blessed them, He said to serve these also. They ate, and were filled. They took up seven baskets of broken pieces that were left over. Those who had eaten were about four thousand" (Mark 8:5-9). The disciples gave Him what they had, they did what they could do, and He multiplied it to do what only He could do.

God expects of us to do what we can do, not to just sit back and wait for something to fall from heaven. Taking that step of faith with the little strength you have can be very scary -- but then we are amazed when the Lord responds to our action of faith by opening the door to the next opportunity.


Click on SUBSCRIBE to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!

Faith is tied to obedience: "God, who 'will reward everyone according to their works' [quoting from Proverbs 24:12b], to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and incorruptibility, eternal life" (Romans 2:5b-7). What we DO is the proof of our faith, what we believe. God rewards such faith with eternal life. St. Paul here shows the need for accompanying our faith with good works, he's not the "faith alone" person that some people say he is.

Perhaps the key proof-text for the "faith alone" folks is Ephesians 2:8-9 - "For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, that no one would boast." What they miss here is that St. Paul is referring to the "works of the Law" - trying to fulfill all the details of the Pharisees' interpretations of Jewish ritual law. But in the next verse, the Apostle uses "works" in a different sense, "good works" or doing good to all people - "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared before that we would walk in them" (v. 10).

Paul wrote along the same lines to his disciple Titus - "Not by works of righteousness, which we did ourselves, but according to His mercy, He saved us, through the washing of regeneration [baptism] and renewing by the Holy Spirit, which He poured out on us richly, through Jesus Christ our Savior; that, being justified by His grace, we might be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life. This saying is faithful, and concerning these things I desire that you affirm confidently, so that those who have believed God may be careful to maintain good works. These things are good and profitable to men" (Titus 3: 5-8). The first "works" are "works of righteousness" or "works of the Law" but the second "works" are "good works" - the fruit of saving faith.

James, the "brother" (half-brother or step-brother or cousin) of our Lord, wrote on this same subject - "But be DOers of the word, and not only hearers, deluding your own selves. For if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a DOer, he is like a man beholding his natural face in a mirror; for he sees himself, and goes away, and immediately forgets what kind of man he was. But he who looks into the perfect law, the law of freedom, and continues, not being a hearer who forgets but a DOer of the word, this man will be blessed in what he DOes" (James 1:22-25). It's not enough to listen to sermons and say "Amen!" We must hear the word, then DO it.

In the next chapter (2:14), James wrote - "What good is it, my brothers, if a man says he has faith, but has no works? Can that faith save him? The implied answer, of course, is "No!" Then in v. 17 he wrote - "Even so faith, if it has no works, is dead in itself." And in v. 20 - "But do you want to know, vain man, that faith apart from works is dead?" Faith without works is dead faith, and dead faith can't save anyone.

And the clincher is v. 24 - "You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith alone." Martin Luther, in his commendable fight against the legalism of penance and indulgences in Roman Catholicism, went too far by insisting on "sola fide" - Latin for "faith alone." And this verse, the only place in the Bible where "faith alone" is found, directly contradicts Luther's "sola fide" doctrine by stating "not by faith alone."

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please Support Agape Restoration Society.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


Sunday, October 20, 2019

You Can Believe Anything in General, But Nothing in Particular

You Can Believe Anything in General, But Nothing in Particular

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

anything in general but nothing in particularSkeptical and sarcastic views toward what other people believe has become the order of the day. But it hides behind a facade of "tolerance" that says we should respect others' beliefs and points of view, while to ourselves we say - "That's a really dumb idea!" The result is that we conclude you can believe anything in general, but nothing in particular. So if you firmly believe in one fixed, settled religious faith, ideology, or philosophy, you will be greeted with rolled eyeballs, sarcasm, skepticism, or outright hostility.

It has thus become "cool" for a person to say that he believes there is no god, no absolute truth, no objective moral standards of right and wrong, of good and evil. But think about that for just a minute: to say - "There is absolutely no absolute, and that's the absolute truth" is an absurdity, a paradox. As the Psalmist wrote - "The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.' They are corrupt. They have done abominable works. There is none who does good" (Psalm 14:1). It is foolish to deny the existence of absolutes because such a statement is itself an absolute. And the result of such denial is increasing corruption.

John Locke was a political philosopher in the years leading up to the American Revolution. From A New Lockean Manuscript and the Limits of Religious Toleration we read -

"As more than one critic has pointed out, Locke’s paper-thin description of religion — the holding of beliefs and the performance of rites conducive to eternal life — hardly fits the complex and encompassing character of most actually existing faiths.

"Locke's Letter begins, indeed, not with the separation of church and state, but with an explication of the nature of Christianity that describes it in almost exclusively practical terms. The work likewise closes with an appendix on heresy that considers additions rather than subtractions from the doctrine as heretical. This diatribe against all 'contrivers of symbols, systems, and confessions' is not accidental to Locke's view of toleration. Instead of pushing for toleration between opposed substantive doctrines, this doctrinal minimalism makes the holding of substantive views itself suspect of endangering the tolerant society.

"It goes hand in hand, moreover, with an equally thin view of religious membership. In the Letter, the church is presented as a voluntary society into which no one is born, and one that is concerned alone with right worship as a way to salvation."

This minimalistic view of religious toleration has brought us today to the point of shoving religion into a corner, into a box, into the four walls of a 'religious establishment' building, a church, where people can perform their cultic rituals and from which no ideas or words or practical ministry should escape, contaminating a "tolerant" society. The First Amendment states that Congress shall make no law concerning an establishment of religion [one particular religious faith] or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

But secular humanism has turned this upside-down to mean that the government should remove all religious expression from the public view, limiting religious freedom to only inside the four walls of a church building. The notion that children should be raised as free-range animals, given the "right" to choose whatever they want to believe and however they want to live, while the schools have become indoctrination camps for brainwashing the kids with LGBTQ ideology, is another absurdity.

In another article, Eric Metaxas gives the reason for his new support of conservatism -

"Especially when you get to the issue of religious liberty, that's actually the core. If you really want to know why --, [it’s] because to lose religious liberty in America is not simply to lose rights. - That’s nonsense. It's about losing something so foundational, so central to the republic that you will eventually lose everything. It's like pulling a thread and it's going to unravel the whole thing.

"I really think that Christians have been the canary in this coal mine. They've seen that there's effectively the attempt to impose, to establish a religion. It's a secular humanist religion, but whenever you're talking about ultimate issues, you're talking about things like personhood, you're talking about sexuality, you’re talking about marriage, these are foundational things that get right to the core of people and cultures."

The freedom of religious expression - the ability to express your beliefs in public without being blackballed, fired from your job, or shoved into a corner, a box where you can only mutter your beliefs to others of the same faith, and hindered from passing on your faith to your children - is foundational to all other freedoms because it defines our very personhood, our family, and the future of our culture.


Click on SUBSCRIBE to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!

In a recent speech at the University of Notre Dame, U.S. Attorney General William Barr stated -

"'The imperative of protecting religious freedom was not just a nod in the direction of piety,' Barr said. 'It reflects the framers' belief that religion was indispensable to sustaining our free system of government.'"

"The Attorney General said numerous measures of social decline are rising as religion recedes from public life, citing higher instances of drug addiction, mental illness, and suicide. Those outcomes are not random, but the fruit of a dedicated campaign against orthodox religious belief, Barr added."

"'This is not decay,' Barr said. 'This is organized destruction. Secularists and their allies have marshaled all the forces of mass communication, popular culture, the entertainment industry, and academia in an unremitting assault on religion and traditional values.'"

A diet of sugary and starchy foods provides a breeding ground for harmful bacteria. In the same way, when young people's minds are filled with oversexualized films and social media, this encourages behavior that spreads disease and decreases the future population to the point of demographic winter: the death of our culture. But this is precisely what the secular humanists and socialists want so they can raise up their utopian phoenix out of the ashes.

Jesus quoted the prophet Isaiah: "the word of Isaiah the prophet might be fulfilled, which he spoke, 'Lord, who has believed our report? To whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?' For this cause they couldn't believe, for Isaiah said again, 'He has blinded their eyes and He hardened their heart, lest they should see with their eyes, and perceive with their heart, and would turn, and I would heal them.' Isaiah said these things when he saw His glory, and spoke of Him. Nevertheless even many of the rulers believed in Him, but because of the Pharisees they didn’t confess it, so that they wouldn't be put out of the synagogue, for they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God" (John 12:38-43).

Isaiah and Jesus foresaw how people would become hardened against the truth because they fear the skepticism, sarcasm, and ridicule of their peers. But Jesus also held out hope: "I have come as a light into the world, that whoever believes in Me may not remain in the darkness. If anyone listens to My sayings, and doesn't believe, I don’t judge him. For I came not to judge the world, but to save the world" (John 12:46-47). Jesus is the Light of the world! He didn't come to judge you, but to save you. Come, receive the Light!

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please Support Agape Restoration Society.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


Saturday, October 12, 2019

Take a Stand With Us!

Take a Stand With Us!

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

Dear friend,

The First Amendment states that the God-given right to the free exercise of religion shall not be infringed. Government does not "grant" us our rights, it must be prevented from infringing upon our natural, God-given rights.

As you may already know, for many years we have been planning to build an "Agape Restoration Community" - a Christian independent living community with 30-45 mostly wheelchair-accessible housing units and a community room / chapel: see www.Agape-Restoration-Society.org/ARC/building-the-ARC.htm. We have located a beautiful 8.8-acre hilltop property in the Borough of Trafford, PA, about 20 miles from downtown Pittsburgh, so our architect and I modified our site plan and preliminary building sketches to meet local zoning requirements and we put money down for an Option to Purchase the property.

The property is zoned "R-3 Multiple Family": zones "R-1 Single Family" and "R-2 Mixed-Use" both allow incidental religious use (a church) so our architect stated in our application that if religious use is permitted in R-1 and R-2 zones, it should also be permitted in the less-restrictive R-3 zone. On May 6, 2019, the then-acting building code inspector agreed with this interpretation of the zoning ordinance, approved our architect's site plan, and wrote that we could now apply for a Building Permit. But we were waiting and waiting for clarification of a minor point until the middle of July, with no response from the town manager.

Then we were informed that a new code inspector would be hired. This person decided to refer our application to the town's attorney, who interpreted the R-3 zoning ordinance to mean that if it doesn't explicitly allow incidental religious use, then it is not allowed. So we had to pay a $300 fee to apply for a zoning variance, hire attorneys, and wait again for the Trafford Zoning Board to meet on September 5.

This meeting lasted two hours: I said that the R-3 zoning ordinance does not need to explicitly allow religious use, because U.S. law is based on English "natural law" that whatever is not prohibited is permitted, whereas European law is based on Roman law that whatever is not explicitly permitted is prohibited. Our architect stated that our planned community room/chapel is less than 10% of the floor area of all the buildings and would greatly enhance the attractiveness of our planned community: most independent living, condo, and townhouse developments have some kind of common meeting spaces.

There were questions from the board and objections from the townspeople, both which demonstrated a clear anti-religious bias: we could have birthday parties, pizza parties, common meals, etc. in the community room, but not religious use: "Would you build this community here without a chapel?" I replied that our organization is registered with the I.R.S. as a non-denominational Christian organization and we intend to build a specifically Christian community. "Will you allow Muslims to live in your Christian community?" "Why do you need an 'altar' and 'sacristy'?" "Will you have fixed seating [pews]?" Attorneys for the adjacent townhouse association, which has a swimming pool and clubhouse where their community sometimes holds meetings and parties, spoke against our application for a zoning variance to allow religious use. The Zoning Board decided not to decide that evening, so they announced a new meeting in three weeks.


Click on SUBSCRIBE to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!

The CDC statistics are 2 in 5 - that's 40% - of adults age 65 years and older have a disability. And as we age, it climbs to 70% of us will be disabled before we die. Will you be proactive and deal with this probability, or think "This doesn't apply to me"?

The Trafford Borough Zoning Board met again on September 25 to give their decision. They did allow me and others to speak: I said that our attorneys had requested that the following federal law be inserted in the minutes; I gave them a copy and I read the underlined portions of the "Title 42 U.S. Code §2000cc. Protection of Land Use as Religious Exercise." The attorneys for the townhouse association asked if our non-profit organization would pay property taxes on the housing units, and I assured them that we would. Then the board met briefly to make their final decision to not grant our requested variance. In this decision, they flatly disregarded this federal law, which clearly states:

    "(b) Discrimination and exclusion
    (1) Equal terms No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms with a nonreligious assembly or institution.
    (2) Nondiscrimination No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation that discriminates against any assembly or institution on the basis of religion or religious denomination."

The board said they will mail me a printed copy of their decision. At first, I didn't see much sense in trying to fight for our First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion. But if we drop the issue, we will have wasted almost five months and several thousands of dollars in architect's and attorney's fees due to Trafford's foot-dragging and resisting. How much more time and money would we have to spend before we could make any headway with the stubborn Trafford Borough? Is it time to look elsewhere? No, we must appeal this clearly illegal decision!

Our architect agrees that this is an unjust decision and that the town is working against its own best interests. Our attorneys advise that we should wait for the written decision and then consider contacting the U.S. Attorney's office in Pittsburgh: when faced with a lawsuit and likely unfavorable decision from the Federal Government, plus fines and legal fees, local municipalities often concede.

I am revising the sketches of our main building to meet standard building codes for an "accessory use" assembly area: equal to or less than 750 sq. ft. and no more than 10% of the area of the building it is located in. This should eliminate any objections about zoning and building codes, as well as our already following federal law.

If that fails to gain local approval, we will make use of the DOJ's Place of Worship Initiative and How to File a Complaint: scroll down to the "Discrimination in Religious Land Use under RLUIPA" section.

So please pray for us and Take a Stand With Us as we take these actions. Do not think - "This doesn't apply to me" because the gradual nibbling away at our free exercise of religion affects every one of us Americans. And please share this message and our ARC website with your friends, especially our little "How YOU Can Help!" leaflets and on social media: let's make this Go Viral!

I CAN'T DO THIS BY MYSELF: I NEED YOUR HELP! So please WRITE US and say you will Take a Stand With US for religious liberty. Thanks in advance!

Yours in Christ,

"Dr. Bob"

Robert D. Hosken, M.Min., D.Min.

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please Support Agape Restoration Society.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


Saturday, October 5, 2019

Will You Pray For Us?

Will You Pray For Us?

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

Dear friend,

The First Amendment states that the God-given right to the free exercise of religion shall not be infringed. Government does not "grant" us our rights, it must be prevented from infringing upon our natural, God-given rights.

As you may already know, for many years we have been planning to build an "Agape Restoration Community" - a Christian independent living community with 30-45 mostly wheelchair-accessible housing units and a community room / chapel: see www.Agape-Restoration-Society.org/ARC/building-the-ARC.htm. We have located a beautiful 8.8-acre hilltop property in the Borough of Trafford, PA, about 20 miles from downtown Pittsburgh, so our architect and I modified our site plan and preliminary building sketches to meet local zoning requirements and we put money down for an Option to Purchase the property.

The property is zoned "R-3 Multiple Family": zones "R-1 Single Family" and "R-2 Mixed-Use" both allow incidental religious use (a church) so our architect stated in our application that if religious use is permitted in R-1 and R-2 zones, it should also be permitted in the less-restrictive R-3 zone. On May 6, 2019, the then-acting building code inspector agreed with this interpretation of the zoning ordinance, approved our architect's site plan, and wrote that we could now apply for a Building Permit. But we were waiting and waiting for clarification of a minor point until the middle of July, with no response from the town manager.

Then we were informed that a new code inspector would be hired. This person decided to refer our application to the town's attorney, who interpreted the R-3 zoning ordinance to mean that if it doesn't explicitly allow incidental religious use, then it is not allowed. So we had to pay a $300 fee to apply for a zoning variance, hire attorneys, and wait again for the Trafford Zoning Board to meet on September 5.

This meeting lasted two hours: I said that the R-3 zoning ordinance does not need to explicitly allow religious use, because U.S. law is based on English "natural law" that whatever is not prohibited is permitted, whereas European law is based on Roman law that whatever is not explicitly permitted is prohibited. Our architect stated that our planned community room / chapel is less than 10% of the floor area of all the buildings and would greatly enhance the attractiveness of our planned community: most independent living, condo and townhouse developments have some kind of common meeting spaces.

There were questions from the board and objections from the townspeople, both which demonstrated a clear anti-religious bias: we could have birthday parties, pizza parties, common meals, etc. in the community room, but not religious use: "Would you build this community here without a chapel?" I replied that our organization is registered with the I.R.S. as a specifically Christian organization and we intend to build a specifically Christian community. "Will you allow Muslims to live in your Christian community?" "Why do you need an 'altar' and 'sacristy'?" "Will you have fixed seating [pews]?" Attorneys for the adjacent townhouse association, which has a swimming pool and clubhouse where their community sometimes holds meetings and parties, spoke against our application for a zoning variance to allow religious use. The Zoning Board decided not to decide that evening, so they announced a new meeting in three weeks.


Click on SUBSCRIBE to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!

The CDC statistics are 2 in 5 - that's 40% - of adults age 65 years and older have a disability. And as we age, it climbs to 70% of us will be disabled before we die. Will you be proactive and deal with this probability, or think "This doesn't apply to me"?

The Trafford Borough Zoning Board met again on September 25 to give their decision. They did allow me and others to speak: I said that our attorneys had requested that the following federal law be inserted in the minutes; I gave them a copy and I read the underlined portions of the "Title 42 U.S. Code §2000cc. Protection of Land Use as Religious Exercise." The attorneys for the townhouse association asked if our non-profit organization would pay property taxes on the housing units, and I assured them that we would. Then the board met briefly to make their final decision to not grant our requested variance. In this decision, they flatly disregarded this federal law, which clearly states:

    "(b) Discrimination and exclusion
    (1) Equal terms No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms with a nonreligious assembly or institution.
    (2) Nondiscrimination No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation that discriminates against any assembly or institution on the basis of religion or religious denomination."

The board said they will mail me a printed copy of their decision. At first, I didn't see much sense in trying to fight for our First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion. But if we drop the issue, we will have wasted almost five months and several thousands of dollars in architect's and attorney's fees due to Trafford's foot-dragging and resisting. How much more time and money would we have to spend before we could make any headway with the stubborn Trafford "burro"? Is it time to look elsewhere? Or should we appeal this clearly illegal decision?

Our architect agrees that this is an unjust decision and that the town is working against its own best interests. Our attorneys advise that we should wait for the written decision and then consider contacting the U.S. Attorney's office in Pittsburgh: when faced with a lawsuit and likely unfavorable decision from the Federal Government, plus fines and legal fees, local municipalities often concede.

I am revising the sketches of our main building to meet the International Building Code for an "accessory use" assembly area: equal to or less than 750 sq. ft. and no more than 10% of the area of the building it is located in. This should bring our plans more into compliance with international zoning and building codes, as well as federal law.

If that fails to gain local approval, see the DOJ's Place of Worship Initiative and How to File a Complaint: scroll down to the "Discrimination in Religious Land Use under RLUIPA" section. Several Christian organizations - Alliance Defending Freedom, Liberty Counsel, Family Research Council, The Heritage Foundation, and American Family Association - may take up our case and help publicize it nationally, as well as local news media we can contact.

So please pray for us as we consider what to do next. And please share this message and our ARC website with your friends, especially our little "How YOU Can Help!" leaflets: let's make this go viral! Thanks in advance!

Yours in Christ,

"Dr. Bob"

Robert D. Hosken, M.Min., D.Min.

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please Support Agape Restoration Society.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


Saturday, September 21, 2019

Is the Bible the Only Word of God?

Is the Bible the Only Word of God?

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

Is the Bible the Only Word of God?In St. Paul's Letter to the Hebrews, ch. 4, verse 12, we read: "For the Word of God is living, and active, and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing even to the dividing of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and is able to discern the thoughts and intentions of the heart." In how many sermons have you heard that this refers to the Bible? Over and over again, we hear preachers in church and over the radio expounding on "the Word of God" as the Bible. it has become so frequent that we've grown accustomed to equating the Bible with the Word of God, and that only the Bible is the Word of God.

But let's look at the next two verses in Hebrews ch. 4: "There is no creature that is hidden from His sight, but all things are naked and laid open before the eyes of Him with Whom we have to do. Having then a Great High Priest, Who has passed through the heavens, Jesus, the Son of God, let us hold tightly to our confession."

Here it becomes quite obvious that St. Paul isn't writing about the Bible: the pronouns "His" and "Him" refer to the most-recently mentioned noun, "the Word of God" - that's how pronouns work, folks. The Living Word of God is a "He", not an "it." And to make it even clearer, St. Paul wrote that He is "Jesus, the Son of God", the subject of this chapter and previous chapters, Jesus, Who is our Great High Priest, greater than Melchizedek and greater even than Moses.

In another place, St. Paul wrote: "take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God" (Ephesians 6:17). I can't tell you how many times I've heard that Paul is telling us to take the Bible and use it as a sword to cut down other people's arguments against faith in Christ. But is that really what he had in mind? Notice that Paul refers to the Word of God as being like a sword, both here and in Hebrews ch. 4. Where else do we see this sword? Look at Revelation 19:11-15a -

"I saw the heaven opened, and behold, a white horse, and He who sat on it is called Faithful and True. In righteousness He judges and makes war. His eyes are a flame of fire, and on His head are many crowns. He has names written and a name written which no one knows but He Himself. He is clothed in a garment sprinkled with blood. His name is called "the Word of God." The armies which are in heaven followed Him on white horses, clothed in white, pure, fine linen. Out of His mouth proceeds a sharp, two-edged sword, that with it He should strike the nations."

This equates the "the Word of God" with the "sharp, two-edged sword" coming out of His mouth (that's where words come from). This is none other than the One Whose name is written on His garment and on His thigh: "KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS" (verse 16) - the conquering Christ Himself!

Now let us look at a couple of other passages in Revelation. First, ch. 20, v. 4: "I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them. I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus, and for the Word of God." Here "the Word of God" is a parallelism, a repetition for the sake of emphasis to clarify "the testimony of Jesus." We see the same thing in Revelation 1:1-2 -

"This is the Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things which must happen soon, which he sent and made known by his angel to his servant, John, who testified to the Word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, about everything that he saw."

Again, John's testifying about "the Word of God" is repeated by "the testimony of Jesus Christ": Jesus Christ is the Word of God, another parallelism. The Bible is only the Word of God insofar as it testifies to the Living Word of God, Jesus Christ. We don't worship the Bible, we worship Jesus Christ. He, not the Bible, should have the first place in our creeds and statements of faith.


Click on SUBSCRIBE to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!

The same person, the Apostle John, wrote in the preface of his Gospel: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him. Without Him was not anything made that has been made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men" (John 1:1-4). Jesus Christ is the "Logos", the "logic" of the universe, the "meaning" of life. Further in this chapter, in v. 14, we read - "The Word became flesh, and lived among us. We saw His glory, such glory as of the one and only Son of the Father, full of grace and truth."

Before Jesus was born, before the Word became flesh, both the Jews and the Greeks understood that "Wisdom" in the Old Testament was identical to the "Logos" of Greek philosophy: "Does not Wisdom cry out? Does not understanding raise her voice?" (Proverbs 8:1). The wise king Solomon continues:

"I [Wisdom] was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, before the earth existed. When there were no depths, I was brought forth, when there were no springs abounding with water. Before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was brought forth; while as yet He had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the beginning of the dust of the world. When He established the heavens, I was there; when He set a circle on the surface of the deep, when He established the clouds above, when the springs of the deep became strong, when He gave to the sea its boundary, that the waters should not violate His commandment, when He marked out the foundations of the earth; then I was the craftsman by His side. I was a delight day by day, always rejoicing before Him, rejoicing in his whole world. My delight was with the sons of men" (verses 23-31).

So both Jews and Greeks understood that "Wisdom" or the "Logos" was that part of God's being which gave expression in the material universe to His creative plan. But they didn't know exactly how this would be worked out. But when "The Word became flesh, and lived among us. We saw His glory" - then the lights went on! Now we see! Now we understand Who they were trying to tell us about! Of course, the Apostle Peter also knew Who was and is the Word of God. But Peter warned us:

"You should remember the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and the commandments of us, the apostles of the Lord and Savior: knowing this first, that in the last days mockers will come, walking after their own lusts, and saying, 'Where is the promise of His coming? For, from the day that the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.' For this they willfully forget, that there were heavens from of old, and an earth formed out of water and amid water, by the Word of God; by which means the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished. But the heavens that now are, and the earth, by the same Word have been stored up for fire, being reserved against the Day of Judgment and destruction of ungodly men" (2 Peter 3:2-7).

The same people who mock religion in general and especially mock those Christians who believe in divine creation, in Christ's second coming and a final Judgment Day, those people believe in "Climate Change" - rising temperatures that will destroy life on earth before our children or grandchildren are grown up. Perhaps - just maybe - they need to repent, change their ways, and turn to the "Logos", the "logic" of the universe, the "meaning" of life, before the heavens and the earth meet their end in fire.

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please Support Agape Restoration Society.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


Saturday, September 7, 2019

WE'RE STICKING TO OUR PLAN!

WE'RE STICKING TO OUR PLAN!

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

We're sticking to our plan!"For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power, love, and self-control. Therefore do not be ashamed of the testimony of our Lord, nor of me His prisoner; but endure hardship for the Gospel according to the power of God, Who saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace, which was given to us in Christ Jesus before times eternal" (2 Tim.1:7-9).

We have the Spirit of power, not of fear. God has called us according to His grace, and that grace is the power, the energies of God Himself, not just a free gift like a birthday present. God's powerful grace gives us the ability to "endure hardship for the Gospel"!

Why am I saying this? On Thursday evening, September 5, we testified at a meeting of the Trafford Zoning Board. Trafford is the borough where we have an Offer to Purchase a beautiful 8.8-acre property on which to build our Agape Restoration Community. This property is the only "R-3 Multiple-Family"-zoned property left in Trafford where we could build a multi-family Christian co-op housing community. Back in May of this year, we received zoning approval to have a community room/chapel in one of the buildings, so we went ahead with sketching conceptual drawings and negotiating with the seller about purchasing the property. Then it happened:

Our architect's earlier proposal to the borough was that R-1 Single Family zones can include educational and religious use, so each less-restrictive zone (R-2 Double-, Multiple-Family, and Group Housing, as well as R-3 Multiple-Family) should also include educational and religious use and this was granted. But later, the borough's attorney returned a legal opinion that in order to have a community room/chapel in our Christian community, we would need a "variance" to the R-3 zoning rules. The borough retracted what they had earlier granted.

Here's what I wrote yesterday to those who said they were praying about the Zoning Board meeting: "The meeting with Trafford Zoning Board last night to request a variance for a 'community room/chapel' in our proposed Agape Restoration Community did not go well for us. All board members and townspeople who spoke had very picky, irrelevant, negative, anti-religious and even anti-Christian comments. The townspeople all made 'NIMBY' (Not In My Back Yard) remarks and some made false and slanderous statements about me personally. None of them spoke up in favor of granting the variance.

"The board's final decision will come on Sep. 25 at 7 p.m. but at this point, it seems not worthwhile to try to move ahead with this location: the locals will fight it at every turn. The last time, about 30 years ago, some builders proposed a townhouse community on this hilltop, the locals all pitched in to hire lawyers, brought a lawsuit and killed the project. We had hoped we could avoid such reactions this time around, but the same old attitudes - plus anti-religious ones - prevailed."

That meeting was like a punch in the face or in the gut: it temporarily knocked the wind out of our sails. But after another night's sleep and a clearer head, I've decided to press our case that this contradicts the normal application of English law on which U.S. law is based that whatever is not specifically forbidden is permitted: religious use in R-3 zones is not forbidden, so it should be permitted. It also flies in the face of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granting "Freedom of Religious Expression" and all the legal precedents for "Freedom of Religious Association." Zoning rules can't overrule the U.S. Constitution.


Click on SUBSCRIBE to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!

One of the Zoning Board members kept asking questions like - "What if a Muslim wants to live in your Christian community because the housing is nicer and less expensive than comparable places?" My reply was that this is a Christian community, not a Muslim or Buddhist or Hindu or atheist community, so why would a Muslim really want to live in a specifically a Christian community? Those other religious confessions are free to build their own religious communities. The board member replied, "Isn't that discrimination?" No, it's freedom of religious association. To force Christians to accept into their community adherents of other faiths would be anti-religious discrimination.

Another board member asked whether the housing co-op fees would be used to support the religious use of the community room/chapel or clergy. Questions like these are irrelevant to the zoning variance application and display an obvious anti-religious, anti-Christian bias. My philosophy professor in university taught us - "To get the right answer, you have to ask the right question." If questions are phrased in such a way that the unavoidable answers sought for are - "Yes, it's discrimination," or "Yes, it's supporting clergy," then those are the wrong questions. The real, right question is - "Does this encourage or discourage the freedom of religious expression and association?"

If we fold on this issue, if we give up the struggle for freedom of religious expression and association, we and other Christians will increasingly be painted into a corner, told - "You can have your religious beliefs if you keep them to yourself, but you can't express them openly with others or hold religious meetings in your own homes or on your own property."

This is precisely what the socialist, secularist ideology and totalitarian religions try to impose on Christians. . . if they allow them to exist at all and don't physically exterminate them. The United States of America was founded on the principles of the freedoms of speech and of religious expression, not merely freedom of thought and freedom of religious belief. People of various beliefs or unbelief should be able to live in peace in this country, expressing their beliefs in their own communities.

For over fifty years now, I have been working and writing for the freedom of religious expression, working for these rights in communist and post-communist Central Europe and Russia. I have published literally hundreds of issues of newsletters and thousands of articles and social media posts on these matters. In this current issue of Hosken-News you will find various articles and my views about zoning restrictions being manipulated in order to deny Christians the right to meet together for worship, etc.

Authorities in one town in Russia where we lived first granted permission to construct a building for worship and then after believers spent much money on building materials and began construction, local Christians of another confession scrawled "Death to Baptists!" on the construction fence and tore down what was started on the building. If you look through the past issues of our Hosken-News over the past nearly 20 years, you'll find hundreds of articles on this very same kind of anti-religious discrimination and persecution.

Our organization Agape Restoration Society Inc. has expended thousands of dollars on architectural fees, an Offer to Purchase, zoning board applications, and now lawyers' fees to build an Agape Restoration Community in Trafford. If we throw in the towel now, that will be money that is lost. But more importantly, it will be one more hole in the dike that's keeping back the flood of the socialist, secularist ideology which is trying very hard to gradually impose its worldview on Christians and on other faiths. We're sticking to our plan!

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please Support Agape Restoration Society.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


Saturday, August 24, 2019

Jesus Christ, the Icon and the Logos of God

Jesus Christ, the Icon and the Logos of God

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

Christ, the Icon of the FatherIn St. Paul's second letter to the Corinthians, he writes - "... the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, Who is the image of God" (2 Cor. 4:4). The Greek word here for "image" is "eikon" and it is used also in Colossians 1:15 referring to Jesus Christ: "Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation."

The Apostle John wrote - "No one has seen God at any time. The one and only Son, Who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him" (John 1:18); in other words, Christ has revealed or made known to us the Father. Jesus Christ said to His disciple Philip - "If you have seen Me, you have seen the Father!" (John 14:9). Moses had to put a veil over his face because he had seen just the backside of God. But God the Father, Who formerly could not be seen by human eyes, has now been revealed in the person of Jesus Christ.

In 2 Cor. 3:18 we read - "But we all, with unveiled face seeing the glory of the Lord as in a mirror, are transformed into the same image [eikon] from glory to glory, even as from the Lord, the Spirit." Again, the Apostle of John wrote - "The Word became flesh, and lived among us. We saw His glory, such glory as of the one and only Son of the Father, full of grace and truth" (John 1:14).

So Jesus Christ is also the Logos - the Word of God. Several New Testament texts testify to this fact: "The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to his servants the things that must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John, who bore witness to The Word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, even to all that he saw" (Revelation 1:1-2); "He is clothed in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which He is called is The Word of God" (Revelation 19:13); "From his mouth comes a sharp sword..." (v. 15); "...and take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is The Word of God" (Ephesians 6:17); "...there were heavens from of old, and an earth formed out of water and amid water by The Word of God" (2 Peter 3:5b).

From "Logos" we have the English word "logical" or "rational" - it is the Logos Who makes life make sense, Who gives meaning and purpose to life and the universe: "And He [Christ] is before all things, and in Him all things hold together" (Colossians 1:17).

How can we apply this to our life? The basic idea of deification or theosis is "partaking" or "sharing" as expressed in 2 Peter 1:3-4 – "His divine power has given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him who called us by glory and virtue, by which have been given to us exceedingly great and precious promises, that through these you may be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust."

The Greek root koinos is found both here and in 1 Corinthians 10:16b-17 – "The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? For we, though many, are one bread and one body, for we all partake of that one bread." So our communion (Gr. "koinonia") is a partaking (Gr. "koinonia") of the divine nature, the body of Christ. St. Peter continues in 2 Peter 1:5-8 to list the many virtues that flow from this koinonia.


Click on SUBSCRIBE to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!
In Genesis, we learn that mankind was created in God’s image and likeness. Adam and Eve could walk with and enjoy intimate fellowship with God. But when they sinned, this likeness and fellowship (koinonia) were lost. Fallen mankind continues to bear the image of God but not His likeness. Christ’s incarnation, partaking of our human nature, then His death and resurrection all allow us to begin the process of restoration, partaking of His divine nature and fellowship with Him.

Note the word “allow”: Christ’s incarnation, death, and resurrection do not force us or make all mankind to automatically partake of the divine nature – that would be universalism. Rather, these divine acts permit us to become "God's fellow workers" (Gr. "synergoi"), as St. Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 3:9: we cooperate with Him to accomplish His will, the restoration of all the cosmos. This cooperation with God is called synergy. It is our free choice, our decision to become coworkers with God or not. Many are called but few are chosen: we must choose to answer the call.

One of the main differences between the eastern and western theological understanding is that the Greeks [Orthodox] focus more on deification and the Latins [Roman Catholics] focus more on redemption. In 1 Corinthians 1:30 St. Paul, however, wrote - "But of Him [the Father] you are in Christ Jesus, who became for us wisdom from God – and righteousness and sanctification and redemption." Here we see the two seemingly different concepts combined: sanctification or holiness (hagiasmos), together with redemption or deliverance (apolutrosis). God the Father's eternal plan is for Christ Jesus, the Sophia and Logos from God, to become both our redemption and our deification or sanctification.

How is it that deification can be identified with sanctification? We have several stories from the lives of those saints who pursued theosis to the point that they actually glowed with the glory of God: The story of St. Seraphim of Sarov is a wonderful example of the peace of God and theosis. Sanctification is becoming a saint, becoming holy, by spending time in the presence of God. St. Paul reminds us – "Pursue peace with all people, and holiness, without which no one will see the Lord" (Hebrews 12:14) If one wants to see the Lord, he must pursue hagiasmos – theosis.

So what we have in 1 Corinthians 1:30 is not opposing concepts, but rather a process: from receiving the Sophia – Logos, the seed implanted in our hearts, to the righteousness of Christ that is imputed to our account, to the redemption that actually releases us from the power of sin, to the sanctification or deification that transforms us into the likeness of Christ – the divine nature. We see this same process in verse 18b – "...to us who are being saved [a process] it is the power of God." This is the process of being restored back into the likeness of God as in the original creation. Too often in western theology the emphasis is almost entirely on salvation as a one-time event of receiving the seed of the Logos and being accounted as righteous, but it ends there without actually becoming righteous, being sanctified and deified.

This process is not merely a "second blessing" or a "Pentecostal experience" that is peddled by televangelists. Pursuing holiness is like running a long-distance race, as St. Paul described it – "Therefore we also, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which so easily ensnares us, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us" (Hebrews 12:1).

In that chapter St. Paul describes the chastening of the Lord that comes to genuine sons, but it is "for our profit, that we may be partakers of His holiness. Now no chastening seems to be joyful for the present, but painful..." (vv. 12:10b-11a). This is synergy, working together with God: it’s no picnic! It is a struggle, an endurance race, it requires physical discipline and spiritual muscle training. St. Paul uses the analogy of strengthening hands that hang down and wobbly knees (v. 12). Let us run the race!

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!












To keep our websites free, please
Support Agape Restoration Society: click on the "DONATE" button there.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


Saturday, August 10, 2019

America Needs to Repent!

America Needs to Repent!

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory forever!

Why is our country in such a mess? Why are the leading presidential candidates busy throwing garbage at each other, and not talking about how they plan to solve the problems of mass killings, rioting, crime in the streets, rising numbers of deaths due to drug overdoses, falling numbers of live births due to abortion, and soaring Federal deficits because of massively growing "entitlement" programs?

It should be clear that America needs to return to the Christian principles that it was founded upon. Instead, in the last 50 years we've removed Bible reading from public schools and taken down the Ten Commandments from public places.

When the firm foundation for instruction in morals is removed, the next generations are left to follow the rule "whatever feels good, do it!" Immediate gratification of one's passions and desires can only be limited by a higher, stronger motivation based on spiritual reality.

It's time for America to repent, before our society disintegrates into warring factions that are incapable of peaceful dialog and the respectful give-and-take that has allowed our country to grow and prosper in the past. Christians: we need to call out to the living God for His mercy on our land before it's too late!

"Unless the Lord builds the house, they labor in vain who build it. Unless the Lord watches over the city, the watchman guards it in vain" (Psalm 127:1). Why are these mass murders taking place? Because we have driven the Lord out of our society so He isn't watching over the city. We've replaced Him with the state as the answer to all our problems. How did this come about?

In my last essay "What Luther Got Right" we considered the ideas and effects of the Protestant Reformation. But what were the causes? What brought Luther to question the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church? Not quite a century before the Reformation, Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press with moveable type. Before that, Bibles had to be copied by hand, a very laborious and time-consuming process: it took about two years to hand-write each page of the Bible, word-by-word. So with the advent of the printing press, the Bible and other books began to be fairly widely-circulated by the early 16th century when the Reformation took place. Historians call this period "The Age of Enlightenment" or "The Age of Reason" when people finally had the information on which to try to make reasonable, rational decisions.


Click on SUBSCRIBE to receive your own free copy of Hosken-News!

Please read "A Letter Concerning Toleration" (PDF, 34 pages) by John Locke. Published in 1689, it "is one of the most under-appreciated texts in the liberal tradition of political philosophy. When read in conjunction with his Second Treatise, it clarifies the relationship Locke envisions between individuals and the state. In the letter, Locke argues that all religious practices should be tolerated unless they are a threat to the proper functioning of the state" (The Federalist Papers).

Locke embodied the ideas of the Enlightenment and of the Protestant Reformation's "sola Scriptura" doctrine that in practice meant "sola every-believer's-interpretation-of-Scripture" because every man was supposed to be enlightened by the Holy Spirit and could correctly interpret the Scriptures by himself alone - each man became a pope unto himself, thus giving rise to the tens of thousands of Protestant denominations.

Also, browse through The Reasonableness of Christianity (PDF, 256 pages) by John Locke, published in 1695, it is "an enquiry into the foundations of Christian belief. He did so anonymously, to avoid public involvement in the fiercely partisan religious controversies of the day. In The Reasonableness of Christianity John Locke considered what it was to which all Christians must assent in faith; he argued that the answer could be found by anyone for themselves in the divine revelation of Scripture alone (sola Scriptura). He maintained that the requirements of Scripture were few and simple, and therefore offered a basis for tolerant agreement among all Christians, and the promise of peace, stability, and security through toleration." (The Federalist Papers)

Locke's views indicate a general acceptance in the 17th century of a Christian worldview based on human reason and autonomy that reflects the Western Enlightenment view of man, but belittles the importance of doctrines such as the person and nature of Christ and the Trinity, and it assumes that a rational, mental assent to the historical fact of Jesus as the Messiah is sufficient for salvation. This assumption makes "the proper functioning of the state" and individual rationality more important than spiritual truths and commitment of one's whole life to Christ. Locke's view of religious tolerance also opened the door to the philosophical relativism of later modernism and post-modernism in the West.

John Locke's ideas were central to the worldview of the Founding Fathers of the United States, and thus also for much of western democracy and political thought. You see here that already in the 17th century, people were beginning to prioritize "the proper functioning of the state" and man's autonomy and rationality over the absolute authority of God and Divine Law, which began to be called "Natural Law" - eventually leaving God entirely out of the picture. Once we concede to the argument of "tolerance" - accepting others' worldviews as equally true and valid, we've lost the battle to relativism. Game over.

Today we live in a secularized, post-Christian society. It has become fashionable to believe the absurd oxymoron - "there are absolutely no absolutes, and that's the absolute truth!" You might recall from high school algebra that in order to solve a problem with multiple unknown variables, you need to find at least one fixed value: without that, the problem can't be solved. But when we are left with no Absolute, no God, with a relativist, materialist, socialist worldview, there is no fixed point of reference on which to base our moral and spiritual values. When one rejects the Absolute, those "values" become simply variables: with no moral compass, the problems of society can't be solved.

We need to return to the one true Absolute, the Divine Authority, God, Who has revealed Himself in His Son, Jesus Christ, the Word of God in the flesh. When God became incarnate ("in the flesh") in Christ, the Truth became knowable. It is He who said - "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except by Me" (John 14:6). America - indeed, the whole world - needs to repent of its rebellion against God and accept Christ as the Absolute Truth!

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit! Christ is among us! He is and ever shall be!

 


To keep our websites free, please
Support Agape Restoration Society: click on the "DONATE" button there.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And click on our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!